212-89 practice question 17 of 25
[Introduction to Incident Handling and Response] Which of the following is not a countermeasure to eradicate cloud security incidents?
Full set: 305 questionsThe eradication phase of the incident response lifecycle focuses on removing the root cause of the incident and eliminating malicious artifacts from the affected systems. Countermeasures include patching vulnerabilities, removing malware, and hardening systems to prevent recurrence. Disabling fundamental security controls like two-factor authentication (2FA) and CAPTCHA is counterintuitive to security best practices. Such an action would actively weaken the system's security posture, increase the attack surface, and potentially facilitate re-entry for an attacker, directly contradicting the goals of eradication.
A. Patching vulnerabilities and improving isolation are fundamental eradication activities aimed at eliminating the exploited weakness and containing the threat.
B. Removing malware files and associated traces is a primary objective of the eradication phase, ensuring the threat is completely eliminated from the environment.
C. Checking and improving data protection controls is a valid hardening step within the eradication and recovery phases to prevent future data breaches.
1. NIST Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2
"Computer Security Incident Handling Guide": Section 3.4.3
"Eradication
" states that this phase involves actions such as "remediating vulnerabilities to prevent similar incidents." Disabling security controls is the opposite of this principle. The guide emphasizes eliminating the components of the incident
such as deleting malware and disabling breached user accounts.
2. Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)
"Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing v4.0": Domain 5
"Security Operations
" discusses incident management. It outlines that eradication involves removing the cause of the incident
which includes patching systems and removing malware
not weakening existing security controls (p. 103).
3. Carnegie Mellon University
Software Engineering Institute
"Defining the Cloud-Native Incident Response Process" (2022): This document discusses the incident response lifecycle in cloud environments. The Eradication step is described as removing the threat from the environment. Actions include "patching vulnerabilities" and "removing malicious code
" while recovery involves "hardening systems." Disabling security features like 2FA would be a direct violation of these principles (Section 4.4
p. 14).
Keep practicing
Take the free 212-89 practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other 212-89 practice questions
- Question 1A large healthcare provider with an extensive network of endpoints experiences a signific…
- Question 2[Introduction to Incident Handling and Response] Johnson an incident handler is working o…
- Question 3[Introduction to Incident Handling and Response] Investigator Ian gives you a drive image…
- Question 4[Introduction to Incident Handling and Response] QualTech Solutions is a leading security…
- Question 5[Risk Assessment and Incident Recovery] Which of the following risk mitigation strategies…
- Question 6[Introduction to Incident Handling and Response] Robert is an incident handler working fo…
