300-220 practice question 11 of 35

When should a threat hunting team revisit their hypothesis during the process?

Full set: 360 questions

Domain Threat Hunting Methodologies

Answer options
A: Before analyzing existing threat intelligence
B: Before deploying security tools
C: After validating the hypothesis
D: Throughout the entire process Correct answer
Correct Answer:
D. Throughout the entire process
Explanation

Threat hunting is an iterative, cyclical process, not a linear one. The initial hypothesis serves as a starting point for the investigation. As the hunting team collects and analyzes data, new evidence may emerge that contradicts, supports, or requires refinement of the original hypothesis. This continuous feedback loop is crucial for adapting the hunt to the evolving understanding of the environment and potential adversary activity. Therefore, the hypothesis must be revisited and potentially adjusted throughout the entire process to ensure the investigation remains focused, efficient, and effective at uncovering hidden threats.

Why Incorrect

A. Threat intelligence is a primary input for forming an initial hypothesis, so revisiting it before this analysis is illogical.
B. Security tools are deployed to gather data to test the hypothesis; revisiting it before this crucial step is premature.
C. After a hypothesis is validated, the process typically transitions to incident response; the key is iterative refinement during the hunt.

References

1. Cisco Press, CCNP CyberOps Professional CBRCOR 350-201 Official Cert Guide. Chapter 10: Threat Hunting. The book describes the threat hunting loop, stating, "If the hypothesis is disproven, the threat hunter should refine the hypothesis and repeat the process." This confirms that hypothesis revision is an integral and continuous part of the hunting cycle, not a single event.

2. Cisco White Paper, Threat Hunting: A Proactive Approach to Finding Hidden Threats. This document illustrates the threat hunting process as a continuous loop involving stages like "Hypothesis," "Investigation," "Uncovering," and "Informing/Enriching." The flow from "Uncovering" back to "Informing/Enriching" and creating new hypotheses demonstrates the need to constantly re-evaluate and refine assumptions based on findings.

3. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), The Threat Hunting Handbook: A Practical Guide for Proactive Threat Detection. Section 2.2, "The Threat Hunting Loop." This handbook describes the hunting process as a loop that includes "Create Hypothesis," "Investigate," and "Analyze." It emphasizes that the analysis phase feeds back into creating new or refined hypotheses, reinforcing the concept that this re-evaluation occurs throughout the process as new information is gathered.

Scroll to Top