AIGP practice question 1 of 25
All of the following may be permissible uses of an Al system under the EU Al Act EXCEPT?
Full set: 192 questionsThe EU AI Act employs a risk-based approach, categorizing AI systems into different tiers. The use of AI for social scoring by public authorities is explicitly placed in the "unacceptable risk" category and is therefore prohibited under Article 5 of the Act. This prohibition is based on the potential for such systems to lead to detrimental, unjustified, or disproportionate treatment, which conflicts with fundamental EU rights and values. In contrast, the other applications listed—law enforcement, welfare distribution, and border control—are classified as "high-risk." High-risk systems are permissible but are subject to strict legal obligations regarding risk management, data governance, transparency, and human oversight before they can be placed on the market.
A. AI systems for certain law enforcement purposes are classified as high-risk under Annex III of the EU AI Act, making them permissible if they meet strict compliance requirements.
B. AI used to evaluate eligibility for public assistance benefits is explicitly defined as a high-risk application in Annex III, meaning its use is permitted under stringent regulation.
D. AI systems for migration, asylum, and border control management are also designated as high-risk applications in Annex III and are therefore permissible, not prohibited.
1. European Parliament. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008
(EU) No 167/2013
(EU) No 168/2013
(EU) 2018/858
(EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU
(EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union
L series
2024/1689.
Article 5(1)(c): Explicitly prohibits "AI systems for the evaluation or classification of natural persons or groups of natural persons over a certain period of time based on their social behaviour or known
inferred or predicted personal or personality characteristics
with the social score leading to... detrimental or unfavourable treatment".
Annex III
Point 5(b): Lists AI systems for evaluating eligibility for public assistance benefits as high-risk.
Annex III
Point 6: Lists various AI systems for law enforcement purposes as high-risk.
Annex III
Point 7: Lists AI systems used in migration
asylum
and border control management as high-risk.
2. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI). (2023). The EU AI Act: A Primer. Stanford University.
Section: "The EU AI Act’s Risk-Based Approach
" Subsection: "Unacceptable Risk." This section explains that the Act bans a small number of AI systems deemed to pose an "unacceptable risk
" with social scoring by public authorities being a primary example of a prohibited practice.
Keep practicing
Take the free AIGP practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other AIGP practice questions
- Question 2Under the Canadian Artificial Intelligence and Data Act, when must the Minister of Innova…
- Question 3CASE STUDY A global marketing agency is adapting a large language model ("LLM") to genera…
- Question 4Why is it important that conformity requirements are satisfied before an AI system is rel…
- Question 5CASE STUDY Please use the following answer the next question: A local police department i…
- Question 6CASE STUDY Please use the following answer the next question: A mid-size US healthcare ne…
- Question 7Training data is best defined as a subset of data that is used to?
