CDPSE practice question 7 of 30

When using anonymization techniques to prevent unauthorized access to personal data, which of the following is the MOST important consideration to ensure the data is adequately protected?

Full set: 218 questions
Answer options
A: The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects. Correct answer
B: The data must be protected by multi-factor authentication.
C: The key must be a combination of alpha and numeric characters.
D: The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention (DLP) technology.
Correct Answer:
A. The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
Explanation

The question describes pseudonymization, a technique often conflated with anonymization. In pseudonymization, direct identifiers are replaced with pseudonyms, but a separate "key" or mapping table is maintained that allows for re-identification. The single most critical control to ensure this technique is effective is to store this key separately and securely from the pseudonymized data. If an attacker accesses the data and the key together, the protection is completely negated, and the data is easily re-identified. This architectural separation is fundamental to the security of the process.

Why Incorrect

B. Multi-factor authentication is a general access control, not a specific consideration for the integrity of the pseudonymization technique itself.
C. Key complexity is important for security, but the physical or logical separation of the key from the data is a more fundamental and critical control.
D. Data loss prevention (DLP) is a control to prevent data exfiltration, not a measure to ensure the de-identification technique itself remains effective.

References

1. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 4(5). Defines pseudonymization as processing personal data so it can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of "additional information," provided that such additional information is "kept separately."

2. ISACA, CDPSE Review Manual, (2020), Domain 3: Data Lifecycle, Section 3.4 Data Protection. The manual emphasizes that for pseudonymization to be effective, the means for re-identification (the key) must be held separately under different controls.

3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NISTIR 8053, De-Identification of Personal Information, (2015), Section 2.2.2. Discusses de-identification techniques and highlights that the security of pseudonymization relies on the inability to access the mapping table (key).

Scroll to Top