CIPP-US practice question 3 of 25

Which jurisdiction must courts have in order to hear a particular case?

Full set: 195 questions
Answer options
A: Subject matter jurisdiction and regulatory jurisdiction
B: Subject matter jurisdiction and professional jurisdiction
C: Personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction Correct answer
D: Personal jurisdiction and professional jurisdiction
Correct Answer:
C. Personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction
Explanation

For a court to have the authority to hear and decide a case, it must have two distinct types of jurisdiction. First, it needs personal jurisdiction (jurisdiction in personam), which is the power over the specific parties (individuals or entities) in the case. Second, it requires subject matter jurisdiction (jurisdiction in rem), which is the power to hear the particular type of legal dispute being presented. Without both, the court cannot issue a valid, binding judgment. This fundamental principle ensures that legal proceedings are conducted in a proper and constitutionally sound forum.

Why Incorrect

A: "Regulatory jurisdiction" is the authority of an administrative agency, such as the FTC or FCC, not a court. B: "Professional jurisdiction" is not a standard legal term for a court's authority to preside over a legal case. D: "Professional jurisdiction" is not a recognized type of court jurisdiction required to hear a legal case.

References

1. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. "Personal Jurisdiction." Wex Legal Dictionary, Cornell University, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/personaljurisdiction.

2. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. "Subject Matter Jurisdiction." Wex Legal Dictionary, Cornell University, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/subjectmatterjurisdiction.

3. Glannon, Joseph W. Civil Procedure: Examples & Explanations. 8th ed., Wolters Kluwer, 2018, Chapter 2, Section A, "The Idea of Jurisdiction."

Scroll to Top