CTAL-TM practice question 18 of 30

Refer to SCENARIO 2 Project 2 is to be delivered using a RAD software development model. There will be two increments, the first will deliver a…

Full set: 228 questions
Refer to SCENARIO 2 Project 2 is to be delivered using a RAD software development model. There will be two increments, the first will deliver a simple prototype user interface to facilitate testing of the sound system delivered by 'Silver Sound Ltd', the second will deliver the full user interface required for the production system. Development of the business requirements and project plan are underway, detailed system analysis will follow for each increment. You have studied the test policy and risk register and must plan the next set of test activities. Which one of the following is the MOST effective approach for this project? SELECT ONE OPTION
Answer options
A: Develop a master lest plan for each increment as soon as systems analysis is complete, then proceed with test analysis.
B: Conduct exploratory testing only for the first increment as it is a prototype solution, commence test charter planning for increment 2
C: Conduct high-level test planning and test analysis now, followed by more detailed test planning and test analysis for each increment considering use of automation where appropriate. Correct answer
D: Finalize detailed test planning now for both increments, conduct exploratory testing for the first increment, then use automated tests only for increment 2.
Correct Answer:
C. Conduct high-level test planning and test analysis now, followed by more detailed test planning and test analysis for each increment considering use of automation where appropriate.
Explanation

In iterative and incremental development models like RAD, the ISTQB CTAL-TM syllabus recommends a tiered approach to test planning. The Test Manager should conduct high-level test planning and analysis for the overall project upfront, and then perform detailed test planning and analysis at the beginning of each specific increment. This approach accommodates evolving requirements, aligns with the iterative delivery of the system, and allows for the strategic integration of test automation as the software matures.

Why Incorrect

A: A Master Test Plan is designed to cover the entire project lifecycle; individual increments should be managed with specific level or phase test plans. B: Restricting the first increment to only exploratory testing neglects the need for structured testing and establishing a proper test baseline. D: Finalizing detailed test planning for all increments upfront contradicts the fundamental principles of iterative and incremental lifecycles where requirements evolve.

References

- ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus (v2012), Section 2.2 Test Planning, pp. 18-20.

- ISTQB Advanced Level Test Manager Syllabus (v2012), Section 2.3 Test Control, p. 22.

Scroll to Top