HPE6-A78 practice question 16 of 25
You have a network with ArubaOS-Switches for which Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) is acting as a TACACS+ server to authenticate managers. CPPM…
Full set: 168 questionsThis approach will work for assigning administrators but requires adjustment for operators. ArubaOS-CX maps the standard TACACS+ priv-lvl attribute to its local user groups. A priv-lvl of 15, typically used for a "manager" role on legacy systems, correctly maps to the ArubaOS-CX "administrators" group. However, the "operators" group on ArubaOS-CX requires a priv-lvl between 1 and 14. If the legacy configuration for the "operator" role sends a priv-lvl of 0 (a common value for lowest-privilege access), it will not map to the "operators" group on the ArubaOS-CX switch, and the user will be denied access. Therefore, the policy needs adjustment for operators.
A. ArubaOS-CX switches do accept standard TACACS+ priv-lvl attributes and map them to local roles, making this statement incorrect.
B. ArubaOS-CX switches fully support TACACS+ for management authentication and authorization, making this statement false.
C. While the auditors group exists, the immediate problem lies with the mapping of the existing operator privilege level, not a future assignment to a different group.
ArubaOS-CX 10.11 Security Guide (R0X46-63001, Edition 1, October 2022), Page 111, "TACACS+ user authorization": "The switch maps the TACACS+ priv-lvl attribute to the user groups. A priv-lvl of 15 maps to the administrators group. A priv-lvl of 1-14 maps to the operators group." This confirms the specific numerical mapping on CX switches.
Keep practicing
Take the free HPE6-A78 practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other HPE6-A78 practice questions
- Question 1You have been asked to send RADIUS debug messages from an ArubaOS-CX switch to a central …
- Question 2A company has Aruba Mobility Controllers (MCs), Aruba campus APs, and ArubaOS-Switches. T…
- Question 3You need to deploy an Aruba instant AP where users can physically reach It. What are two …
- Question 4What is a consideration for implementing wireless containment in response to unauthorized…
- Question 5What is a use case for implementing RadSec instead of RADIUS?
- Question 6What correctly describes the Pairwise Master Key (PMK) in thee specified wireless securit…
