IIA-CRMA practice question 2 of 35

According to the Standards, which of the following best describes why initial audit test results should be reported to the auditor-in-charge prior to advising management?

Full set: 283 questions

Domain Internal Audit Roles and Responsibilities

Answer options
A: It increases the likelihood of obtaining the audit client's agreement with the results.
B: It ensures that an appropriate chain of evidence is maintained through the workpapers.
C: It helps ensure that appropriate professional judgments and conclusions are made. Correct answer
D: It is required to demonstrate that effective engagement supervision has occurred.
Correct Answer:
C. It helps ensure that appropriate professional judgments and conclusions are made.
Explanation

The primary purpose of reporting initial test results to the auditor-in-charge is to facilitate proper engagement supervision. The supervisor is responsible for ensuring that the audit work is performed correctly, the evidence gathered is sufficient and appropriate, and the conclusions drawn are logical and well-supported. This internal review process is a critical quality control step that validates the staff auditor's work and ensures that any judgments and conclusions communicated to management are professionally sound and accurate.

Why Incorrect

A. Gaining client agreement is a desired outcome, but the primary reason for supervisory review is to first ensure the internal quality and validity of the findings.
B. The chain of evidence is maintained through proper workpaper documentation practices, which is distinct from the supervisory review of conclusions.
D. While this review is evidence of supervision, the fundamental reason for the review is to ensure quality and appropriate judgment (Option C), not just to check a box.

References

1. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), January 2017.

Standard 2340 – Engagement Supervision: "Engagements must be properly supervised to ensure objectives are achieved, quality is assured, and staff is developed." This standard directly links supervision to assuring quality, which encompasses the professional judgments and conclusions mentioned in option C.

2. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), Implementation Guide for Standard 2340: Engagement Supervision, July 2020.

Paragraph on "Elements of Supervision": The guide states that supervision includes "reviewing the work performed to ensure it adequately supports the engagement observations, conclusions, and recommendations." This directly supports the idea that the supervisor's review is essential for validating the conclusions before they are finalized or shared.

3. Sawyer, L. B., Dittenhofer, M. A., & Scheiner, J. H. (2003). Sawyer's Internal Auditing: The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing (5th ed.). The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.

Chapter 19, "Supervising the Audit Assignment": This chapter details the supervisor's role in reviewing workpapers to "determine that the conclusions are sound and are supported by the audit evidence." This aligns with ensuring appropriate professional judgments and conclusions are made.

Scroll to Top