ISTQB-CTFL-FOUNDATION practice question 11 of 35
Given the following review types and review characteristics: a. Pair review b. Walkthrough c. Technical review d. Inspection 1. Formal 2. Informal 3…
Full set: 403 questionsThis option correctly matches the review types with their defining characteristics according to the ISTQB syllabus. A pair review (a) is an informal (2) process. A walkthrough (b) is often led by the author to present a work product, gain understanding, and generate new ideas (3). A technical review (c) is a more formal process focused on improving the product quality and can serve as a training opportunity (4). An inspection (d) is the most formal (1) review type, characterized by defined roles, metrics, and strict entry/exit criteria.
A. This option incorrectly classifies a pair review as formal, which is a defining characteristic of an inspection.
B. This option incorrectly classifies a technical review as informal and misaligns the purposes of other review types.
D. This option incorrectly swaps the primary purposes of a walkthrough (generating ideas) and a technical review (training/product improvement).
ISTQB® Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus V4.0, 2023, Section 3.2.4 Review types, pages 34-35.
Keep practicing
Take the free ISTQB-CTFL-FOUNDATION practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other ISTQB-CTFL-FOUNDATION practice questions
- Question 1Which of the following statements refers to good testing practice to be applied regardles…
- Question 3Which of the following statements regarding the testing quadrants model is correct?
- Question 4Which of the following statements best describe Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)?
- Question 5Which of the following statements contradicts the general principles of testing?
- Question 6After being in operation for many years, a document management system must be decommissio…
- Question 7Given the following examples of entry and exit criteria: 1. A defined level of code cover…
