LEED-AP-HOMES practice question 6 of 35

A project team targets concrete as a material to receive Environmentally Preferable Products credit for fly ash content. Due to weather conditions…

Full set: 100 questions
A project team targets concrete as a material to receive Environmentally Preferable Products credit for fly ash content. Due to weather conditions, the structural engineer suggests reducing the fly ash content in a small portion of the suspended slab areas to speed the curing process and achieve the required strength. The adjusted calculation shows that reduced fly ash in these areas will result in failure to achieve the targeted point. Which of the following is the most effective strategy that the LEED AP could pursue?
Answer options
A: Submit a CIR requesting the low fly ash suspended slab be removed from the calculations
B: Ignore the engineer’s recommendation and proceed with the original design
C: Apply for a Regional Priority exemption since the local climate interfered with the project team’s best effort to achieve the point
D: Demand the project team slow the construction schedule so additional curing time will allow the required amount of fly ash to be used Correct answer
Correct Answer:
D. Demand the project team slow the construction schedule so additional curing time will allow the required amount of fly ash to be used
Explanation

The structural engineer's recommendation is based on achieving the required concrete strength for structural integrity, which cannot be ignored. The issue stems from a conflict between the material's properties (slower curing with fly ash) and the project schedule, exacerbated by weather. The most effective strategy is to address the root cause by adjusting the project constraint that is creating the conflict—in this case, the schedule. Proposing to extend the schedule allows for the necessary curing time, enabling the project to use the specified high fly ash concrete mix, thereby meeting both the structural requirements and the LEED credit goals. This represents a classic integrative process solution, balancing competing project demands.

Why Incorrect

A. A Credit Interpretation Request (CIR) is used to clarify ambiguous credit language, not to request an exemption from credit requirements for a project-specific issue.
B. Ignoring a structural engineer's recommendation regarding strength and safety is unprofessional, dangerous, and could lead to structural failure. Project safety always supersedes LEED points.
C. Regional Priority (RP) credits are pre-determined by USGBC for specific locations to encourage addressing local environmental priorities; they are not an exemption mechanism for other credits.

References

1. U.S. Green Building Council. (2015). LEED Core Concepts Guide, Third Edition. Chapter 2, "The Integrative Process," p. 26. This chapter emphasizes that the LEED AP's role involves facilitating collaborative, holistic decision-making to resolve problems and find synergistic solutions among competing project goals like schedule, budget, and sustainability targets. This supports proposing a schedule adjustment as a collaborative solution.

2. American Concrete Institute. (2003). ACI 232.2R-03: Use of Fly Ash in Concrete. Section 4.2, "Setting Time," and Section 4.3, "Rate of Strength Development." This document confirms that the use of fly ash, particularly in cooler weather, can delay concrete setting times and slow the rate of early-age strength development. This validates the engineer's concern and shows that allowing more time is the correct technical solution.

3. U.S. Green Building Council. (2021). LEED v4.1 Homes and Multifamily Reference Guide. "MR Credit: Environmentally Preferable Products." The credit requires calculations to be based on the final, installed products. The guide provides no mechanism for excluding materials that fail to meet the criteria due to construction-phase decisions, reinforcing that options A and C are procedurally incorrect.

Scroll to Top