Which of the following disclosures is NOT required for an EU organization that developed and deployed a high-risk Al system?

The EU AI Act establishes comprehensive transparency and information obligations for providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems. These obligations include providing clear instructions for use that detail the system's capabilities, limitations, and the human oversight measures in place. The Act also grants individuals the right to a meaningful explanation of decisions made by high-risk systems, which forms the basis for contestation. Furthermore, a general transparency rule requires that individuals be informed when they are interacting with an AI system. However, the AI Act does not specifically mandate the disclosure of the physical or logical locations where data is stored. This requirement is more directly addressed by data protection laws like the GDPR, particularly concerning data processing records and international data transfers, rather than being a core transparency obligation for the AI system itself under the AI Act.

A. The EU AI Act explicitly requires that the instructions for use for a high-risk AI system include information concerning the human oversight measures.

B. The right to an explanation for a decision made by a high-risk AI system is a key provision, which inherently supports an individual's ability to contest that decision.

D. A core transparency principle in the EU AI Act is the obligation to inform natural persons that they are interacting with an AI system, unless it is obvious.

---

1. European Parliament. EU AI Act: provisional agreement on the final text. (February 2

2024). This text forms the basis for the final regulation.

For A (Human Oversight): Article 13(3)(d) states that the instructions for use shall contain "a specification of the human oversight measures provided for in Article 14

including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the users."

For B (Contestation): Article 68c(1) establishes the "Right to an explanation of individual decision-making

" stating that any affected person "shall have the right to obtain from the deployer a clear and meaningful explanation" on the role of the high-risk AI system in the decision-making procedure. This right is the foundation for any meaningful contestation.

For D (Disclosure of AI Use): Article 52(1) outlines transparency obligations

stating that providers and deployers "shall ensure that natural persons are informed that they are interacting with an AI system

unless this is obvious from the circumstances and the context of use."

For C (Correct Answer): A review of the transparency and information provisions in the final agreed text (e.g.

Articles 13

52

68c) shows no specific requirement to disclose the location of data storage as a condition for deploying a high-risk AI system under this regulation. This obligation falls under the purview of the GDPR (e.g.

Articles 13

14

30

and Chapter V).