CAMS practice question 21 of 35

A non-US bank is implementing a sanctions compliance program. Which extraterritorial reach of Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations would matter the most to the foreign bank?

Full set: 863 questions
Answer options
A: OFAC administers sanctions based on criminal investigations against targeted foreign individuals.
B: OFAC sanctions programs prohibit transactions and require the blocking of assets of foreign individuals that appear in negative media sources.
C: OFAC acts only under presidential wartime emergency powers, against countries and foreign individuals considered enemies of the US.
D: OFAC has the power to impose significant penalties on foreign individuals who are found to be in violation of the blocking orders. Correct answer
Correct Answer:
D. OFAC has the power to impose significant penalties on foreign individuals who are found to be in violation of the blocking orders.
Explanation

The most significant aspect of the Office of Foreign Assets Control's (OFAC) extraterritorial reach for a non-US bank is its authority to impose severe penalties on foreign entities. This power compels compliance even without a direct US presence. Foreign banks can fall under OFAC jurisdiction by processing transactions in U.S. dollars, which clear through the US financial system, or through "secondary sanctions" that target non-US persons for engaging in specific activities with sanctioned parties. The threat of substantial fines and, most critically, the risk of being cut off from the US financial system (becoming a sanctioned entity itself) is the primary driver for foreign banks to implement robust OFAC compliance programs.

Why Incorrect

A. OFAC designations are based on US foreign policy and national security goals under various legal authorities, not solely on criminal investigations.
B. OFAC designations are formal legal actions. While adverse media may trigger an investigation, it is not the basis for a sanction; a formal designation is required.
C. OFAC's authority extends beyond wartime powers (e.g., Trading with the Enemy Act) to non-emergency situations under statutes like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

References

1. ACAMS CAMS 6th Edition Study Guide. Chapter 2, "International AML/CFT Standards," Section: "US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)." The guide explains that OFAC has the power to impose significant civil and criminal penalties on institutions, including foreign ones that violate sanctions, particularly when transactions involve the U.S. financial system (e.g., U.S. dollar clearing).

2. U.S. Department of the Treasury. "A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments." May 2, 2019. This official guidance document outlines OFAC's expectations for sanctions compliance programs and details the penalty and enforcement process. Section C, "Violations and Enforcement Actions," discusses how OFAC assesses penalties, which applies to any entity subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including foreign entities engaging in transactions involving the U.S.

3. Zarate, J. C. (2013). Treasury's War: The Unleashing of a New Era of Financial Warfare. PublicAffairs. Chapter 5, "The Architects and the Tools," describes the development and application of U.S. financial sanctions, emphasizing how the threat of exclusion from the U.S. financial system and significant penalties forces compliance from foreign financial institutions, demonstrating the practical extraterritorial effect of OFAC's authority.

Scroll to Top