CFE-LAW practice question 5 of 25

Which of the following is a legal element that the government must show to prove a conspiracy claim?

Full set: 158 questions
Answer options
A: All of the conspirators knowingly committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
B: The defendant entered into an agreement to commit an illegal act with at least one other person. Correct answer
C: The conspirators accomplished the purpose of the conspiracy that was initially established.
D: The defendant intentionally or unintentionally joined and participated in the illegal scheme.
Correct Answer:
B. The defendant entered into an agreement to commit an illegal act with at least one other person.
Explanation

The core of a criminal conspiracy is the agreement. To establish a conspiracy claim, the government must prove that the defendant entered into an agreement with at least one other person to commit an illegal act. This agreement is the actus reus (the guilty act) of the offense. While other elements, such as intent and an overt act (in many jurisdictions), are also required, the agreement itself is the foundational element that distinguishes conspiracy from other crimes. The crime is complete once the agreement is made and an overt act is committed, even if the ultimate illegal objective is never achieved.

Why Incorrect

A. This is incorrect because the law typically requires that only one of the conspirators commits an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, not all of them.
C. This is incorrect because conspiracy is an inchoate crime. The offense is the agreement to commit a crime, not the successful completion of that crime.
D. This is incorrect because joining a conspiracy requires specific intent (mens rea). A defendant must have knowingly and voluntarily joined the scheme; unintentional participation is not sufficient for a conspiracy conviction. ---

References

1. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). Fraud Examiners Manual, International Edition. (2023). The manual outlines the essential elements of conspiracy, emphasizing the agreement as the primary component. It specifies that the prosecution must prove: (1) an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime, (2) the defendant knowingly and voluntarily joined the conspiracy, and (3) at least one overt act was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy by a co-conspirator. This supports that the agreement (Option B) is a required element.

2. Lafave, W. R. (2017). Criminal Law (6th ed.). West Academic Publishing. In the chapter on "Inchoate Crimes," the text defines conspiracy as fundamentally an agreement between two or more persons for the purpose of committing a crime. It clarifies that the agreement is the "gist of the offense" (Section 12.2(a)).

3. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute (LII). "Conspiracy." In Wex Legal Dictionary/Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/conspiracy. The LII states, "The elements of the crime of conspiracy are (1) an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, (2) an intent to achieve the agreement's goal, and (3) (in some jurisdictions) an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy." This directly supports Option B as a core element.

4. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. (2015). Criminal Law. Chapter 8, Section 8.1 "Inchoate Crimes". This open-source university textbook states that the criminal act element for conspiracy is the agreement to commit a crime. It explicitly notes that the crime can be prosecuted even if the planned offense is never completed, refuting Option C.

Scroll to Top