CFE-LAW practice question 4 of 25

Which of the following is a legal element that the government must show to prove a cnminal conspiracy?

Full set: 158 questions
Answer options
A: One of the conspirators knowingly committed an oven act in furtherance of the conspiracy Correct answer
B: The conspirators accomplished the purpose of the conspiracy that was initially established
C: The defendant knew all the details or objectives of the conspiracy
D: The defendant knew the identity of all the participants in the conspiracy
Correct Answer:
A. One of the conspirators knowingly committed an oven act in furtherance of the conspiracy
Explanation

To establish a criminal conspiracy, the prosecution must prove several elements. A key element under many statutes, including the primary U.S. federal conspiracy law (18 U.S.C. § 371), is the commission of an "overt act." This means that after two or more individuals agree to commit a crime, at least one of them must take a concrete step to advance the illegal objective. This act demonstrates that the agreement has moved beyond mere discussion and into an active stage. The overt act itself need not be criminal, but it must be done in furtherance of the conspiracy's goal. The crime is complete with the agreement and this overt act.

Why Incorrect

B. The crime of conspiracy is complete upon the agreement and an overt act; the underlying criminal objective does not need to be accomplished.
C. A defendant only needs to understand the essential nature of the illegal plan, not every detail or objective of the conspiracy.
D. A conspirator is not required to know the identity of all other participants involved in the criminal agreement.

References

1. ACFE. (2023). Fraud Examiners Manual, International Edition. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Section 4.305, "Conspiracy." This section outlines the elements of conspiracy, stating, "The government must prove that at least one of the conspirators committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy." It also explicitly clarifies that the government does not need to prove the defendant knew all details or all co-conspirators, nor that the conspiracy was successful.

2. Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (LII). "Conspiracy." Wex Legal Dictionary/Encyclopedia. Accessed [Current Date]. The entry on conspiracy explains, "Most conspiracy statutes require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy." It further clarifies that a conspirator need not know all other conspirators or all details of the plan.

3. LaFave, W. R. (2017). Criminal Law (6th ed.). West Academic Publishing. Chapter 12, Section 12.2(c), "The Overt Act Requirement." This academic legal treatise details that while the agreement is the core of conspiracy, a majority of jurisdictions require proof of an overt act for the crime to be complete.

Scroll to Top