CIPP-US practice question 11 of 25
SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION: Larry has become increasingly dissatisfied with his telemarketing position at…
Full set: 195 questionsLarry's misconception is about the applicability of federal law, specifically the U.S. Constitution, to his private-sector workplace. He believes his Fourth Amendment rights are being violated by his employer, SunriseLynx, opening his personal mail. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by government actors. This protection does not generally extend to the actions of private entities, such as private-sector employers. This legal principle is known as the "state action doctrine." While other laws or tort claims (like intrusion upon seclusion) might apply to the employer's actions, Larry's reliance on the Fourth Amendment in this context is a fundamental misunderstanding.
B. Larry's concern about the state Do Not Call list is likely valid, as Evan is incorrectly dismissing it. This is not Larry's misconception.
C. Larry is not misinterpreting state law; he correctly believes the state DNC list should be followed. His supervisor, Evan, is the one misinterpreting it.
D. The scenario does not indicate Larry has a misconception about tort law; his specific stated concern is about the Fourth Amendment, which is constitutional law.
1. Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921). This Supreme Court case established that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies only to governmental action, not to the conduct of private individuals or entities.
2. Chemerinsky, E. (2019). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 6, Section 6.4, "The State Action Doctrine," explains in detail that the Constitution's protections of individual liberties apply only to the government.
3. Sajadi, S. (2012). Private Searches, Public Functions: The Fourth Amendment and Private Employer Drug Testing. Washington University Law Review, 90(1), 275-316. This article discusses the state action doctrine in the specific context of private employment, confirming the Fourth Amendment's general inapplicability. (Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/lawlawreview/vol90/iss1/5)
Keep practicing
Take the free CIPP-US practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other CIPP-US practice questions
- Question 1In 2012, the White House and the FTC both issued reports advocating a new approach to pri…
- Question 2What is an exception to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 ban on intercep…
- Question 3Which jurisdiction must courts have in order to hear a particular case?
- Question 4Which of the following is an important implication of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform a…
- Question 5All of the following organizations are specified as covered entities under the Health Ins…
- Question 6SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION: Declan has just started a …
