ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR practice question 4 of 35
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have…
Choose your answer, then check it against the explanation.
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance.
The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations,
including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and
preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC
27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a
confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the
documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information
security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although
Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the
same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment's top management to
understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed
remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by
Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information
security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment's representatives stated that the
company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the
audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment's operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the
marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to
control employees’ access rights. Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC
27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue
was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that
Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities. The procedures of the company stated that "Logs
recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed," yet the company did not
present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information
review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings
during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation
for certification.
According to scenario 6, the marketing department employees were not following the access control
policy. Which option is correct in this case?
Question 4 of 35
Keep practicing
Take the free ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR practice questions
- Question 1In the context of a third-party certification audit, it is very important to have effecti…
- Question 2You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home called ABC that provides h…
- Question 5Which six of the following actions are the individual(s) managing the audit programme res…
- Question 6Scenario: Northstorm is an online retail shop offering unique vintage and modern accessor…
- Question 7In the context of a third-party certification audit, confidentiality is an issue in an au…
- Question 9Scenario 4: Branding is a marketing company that works with some of the most famous compa…
