In which of the following persuasion methods, the influencer uses logics and objective reasons to persuade the others to buy into influencer's ideas?

Persuasive reasoning is a 'push' style of influence that involves using logical arguments, facts, and objective data to convince others of a particular viewpoint or course of action. The influencer presents a well-reasoned case, appealing to the other party's sense of logic and rationality. This method is effective when the influencer has credibility and the arguments are sound. It directly aligns with the use of "logics and objective reasons" to persuade others, as stated in the question.

B. Collaborative (pull) involves finding common ground and working together towards a mutually beneficial solution, rather than using one-sided logical arguments.
C. Visionary (pull) inspires others by appealing to their emotions, values, and a shared vision of the future, not primarily through logic.
D. Directive (push) relies on assertion, authority, or position to instruct others, without necessarily providing logical justification.

CIPS (2018), L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, Official CIPS Course Book, Profex Publishing, pp. 118-120. The text describes push and pull influencing styles, specifically identifying 'persuasive reasoning' as a push style that uses "logical, rational arguments" and "facts and evidence".

Yukl, G., & Chavez, C. (2002). Influence tactics and leader effectiveness. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership (pp. 139-165). Information Age Publishing. This academic text categorizes 'rational persuasion' (synonymous with persuasive reasoning) as a core tactic involving logical arguments and factual evidence.