SIAMF practice question 9 of 10

What is a disadvantage of the hybrid service integrator structure?

Full set: 40 questions
Answer options
A: The customer can inadvertently develop a long term dependency on the service integration partner.
B: The customer can revert to an internally sourced solution if the service integration partner fails to live up to expectations.
C: The high level of dependency on the service integrator adds risks to continuity.
D: The service integrator might be perceived to be biased, even if this is not the case. Correct answer
Correct Answer:
D. The service integrator might be perceived to be biased, even if this is not the case.
Explanation

The hybrid service integrator structure combines an internal customer team with an external service integration partner. A key disadvantage of this complex model is managing the relationship and potential conflicts between these two entities and the service providers. The external partner might be perceived as biased towards other external providers, especially if they have existing relationships or are a service provider themselves. Similarly, the internal team could be seen as favoring internal providers. This potential for perceived bias and conflict of interest is a significant management challenge inherent to the hybrid structure.

Why Incorrect

A. The customer can inadvertently develop a long term dependency on the service integration partner. This is a primary disadvantage of the fully external service integrator model. The hybrid model is specifically designed to mitigate this risk by retaining internal strategic capabilities.
B. The customer can revert to an internally sourced solution if the service integration partner fails to live up to expectations. This is a key advantage of the hybrid model, as the customer retains some internal capability, providing a fallback option.
C. The high level of dependency on the service integrator adds risks to continuity. This is a defining disadvantage of the fully external service integrator model. The hybrid model reduces this dependency by sharing integration responsibilities. ---

References

1. Scopism. (2020). Service Integration and Management (SIAM™) Foundation Body of Knowledge.

Section 4.3.3, 'Hybrid service integrator': This section lists the disadvantages of the hybrid model, stating, "If the external service integrator is also a service provider, there is a risk of a conflict of interest." This directly supports the reasoning for answer D, as a conflict of interest leads to perceived or actual bias.

Section 4.3.2, 'External service integrator': This section lists the disadvantages for the external model, including: "The customer is highly dependent on the service integrator" and "This adds risk to business continuity." This confirms that options A and C are primary disadvantages of the external model, not the hybrid one.

Section 4.3.3, 'Hybrid service integrator': This section lists as an advantage: "The customer can revert to an internally sourced service integrator if the external service integration partner fails to live up to expectations." This confirms that option B is an advantage.

Scroll to Top