300-215 practice question 6 of 25
A cybersecurity analyst is analyzing a complex set of threat intelligence data from internal and external sources. Among the data, they discover a…
Full set: 131 questionsThe scenario presents multiple, correlated indicators of compromise (IoCs) that align with both internal observations and external threat intelligence. The combination of unusual network traffic, a spike in failed logins, and suspicious file access, when contextualized with an active ransomware campaign targeting the industry, strongly suggests an ongoing attack. According to standard incident response frameworks, the immediate priority is to contain the threat to prevent further damage and lateral movement. Isolating affected systems is a critical containment step, and activating the formal incident response plan ensures a structured, coordinated, and effective reaction to the security incident.
A. Passive monitoring is a negligent response, as the correlated indicators strongly suggest an active threat, not a coincidence, requiring immediate action to mitigate risk.
C. While valuable for long-term prevention, user training is not an appropriate immediate response to what appears to be an active, malicious intrusion.
D. Dismissing multiple, strong, and contextualized threat indicators as "normal" without investigation is a critical error that could lead to a catastrophic breach.
1. NIST Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide. Section 3.2, "Containment, Eradication, & Recovery," states, "Containment is the first step in recovery... an essential part of the process is to make a decision on the most effective strategy for containing the incident." Section 3.2.2, "Containment Strategy," further details that containment actions can include isolating a network segment or disconnecting individual systems. This supports isolating systems and activating the plan.
2. Cisco, "Threat-Centric Incident Response Playbook" (2017). The playbook emphasizes the importance of moving from detection to containment swiftly. In the "Containment" phase (p. 10), it outlines actions such as "Isolate the host from the network" and "Block malicious IP addresses" as primary steps after identifying a credible threat, which aligns directly with the recommended action.
3. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, "Defining Incident Response" (2017). This document outlines the incident response lifecycle. The "Analysis" phase involves correlating data from multiple sources (as the analyst has done). The immediate next step is "Containment," described as actions taken to "stop the incident from causing further damage," which validates the need to isolate systems and formally manage the response. (Reference: CERT/CC, Incident Management Team).
Keep practicing
Take the free 300-215 practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other 300-215 practice questions
- Question 1A security team detected an above-average amount of inbound tcp/135 connection attempts f…
- Question 3An incident response analyst is preparing to scan memory using a YARA rule. How is this t…
- Question 4Data has been exfiltrated and advertised for sale on the dark web. A web server shows: Da…
- Question 5During a routine security audit, an organization's security team detects an unusual spike…
- Question 8What is the steganography anti-forensics technique?
- Question 10Which tool should be used for dynamic malware analysis?
