300-215 practice question 1 of 25
A security team detected an above-average amount of inbound tcp/135 connection attempts from unidentified senders. The security team is responding based on their incident response playbook. Which two elements are part of the eradication phase for this incident? (Choose two.)
Full set: 131 questionsThe eradication phase of incident response focuses on eliminating the root cause of the incident and removing all malicious artifacts from the environment. In the given scenario of excessive inbound connection attempts, the playbook's eradication phase would involve two key actions:
1. Removing any potential compromise: The connection attempts may have succeeded in delivering malware. Using anti-malware software is a fundamental step to scan for and remove any malicious code from affected systems.
2. Eliminating the attack vector: To prevent the identified malicious senders from repeating the attack, their IP addresses should be added to a permanent enterprise block list. This action eradicates the specific threat source from being able to access the network.
B. data and workload isolation: This is a containment strategy, not eradication. Its purpose is to limit the spread and impact of an incident, not to remove the threat itself.
C. centralized user management: This is a foundational security control related to identity and access management, typically part of the preparation or hardening phase, not a direct eradication step for this type of incident.
D. intrusion prevention system: An IPS is primarily a tool for detection and containment. While it blocks attacks, its real-time blocking function is considered containment. The permanent rule implementation is better described by block listing.
1. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2
"Computer Security Incident Handling Guide":
Section 3.4.3
Eradication and Recovery (Page 39): States
"In the eradication phase
the incident response team eliminates the cause of the incident. For example
for a malware incident
the team would remove the malware from infected hosts. They would also identify and mitigate all vulnerabilities that were exploited." This directly supports using anti-malware (A) and mitigating the vulnerability of being accessible to attackers by blocking them (E).
2. Cisco
"Incident Response: How to Fight Back" White Paper:
Section: The Incident Response Process
Eradication (Page 4): Describes this phase as when "the IR team works to eliminate the components of the incident... This could include removing malware
deleting accounts used by the attacker
or identifying and mitigating the vulnerabilities that were exploited." This aligns with removing malware (A) and mitigating the threat by blocking the source (E).
3. Carnegie Mellon University
Software Engineering Institute
"Defining the Building Blocks of a Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT)":
Section 2.3
Incident Handling Life Cycle: This document
which outlines foundational CSIRT concepts
describes eradication as the phase for removing the cause and effects of the incident. This includes "removing malicious code" and "implementing blocks to prevent recurrence from the same source
" which correspond directly to options A and E.
Keep practicing
Take the free 300-215 practice test
Ten exam-style questions with answers and explanations, plus the exam facts and study guides.
More questions
Other 300-215 practice questions
- Question 3An incident response analyst is preparing to scan memory using a YARA rule. How is this t…
- Question 4Data has been exfiltrated and advertised for sale on the dark web. A web server shows: Da…
- Question 5During a routine security audit, an organization's security team detects an unusual spike…
- Question 6A cybersecurity analyst is analyzing a complex set of threat intelligence data from inter…
- Question 8What is the steganography anti-forensics technique?
- Question 10Which tool should be used for dynamic malware analysis?
