COBIT-DESIGN-AND-IMPLEMENTATION practice question 24 of 25

Which of the following is the BEST approach to resolve competing priorities for the design of a governance system?

Full set: 120 questions
Answer options
A: Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
B: Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.
C: Utilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives.
D: Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design. Correct answer
Correct Answer:
D. Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
Explanation

COBIT is fundamentally a stakeholder-driven framework. The goals cascade translates stakeholder needs into enterprise goals and, ultimately, into priorities for governance and management objectives. When these priorities conflict, the most effective and appropriate approach is to facilitate a discussion among all key stakeholders. This collaborative process ensures that different perspectives are heard, trade-offs are understood, and a consensus can be reached on a balanced design that best supports the enterprise's overall strategic objectives. This approach fosters buy-in and ensures the resulting governance system is relevant and supported.

Why Incorrect

A. Focusing only on immediate benefits can compromise long-term strategic goals and is not a balanced approach to resolving conflicts.
B. Deferring to a single function like risk and assurance ignores other critical business drivers and contradicts COBIT's holistic, enterprise-wide perspective.
C. Relying solely on generic computations ignores the unique context of the enterprise; the COBIT design process requires professional judgment and stakeholder input.

References

1. ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, 2018, Section 4.1 "Goals Cascade," p. 21. The goals cascade is based on translating stakeholder needs, implying that resolving conflicts among those needs is essential.

2. ISACA, COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Governance Solution, 2018, Section 2.2 "The Intended Audience for This Guide," p. 10. This section states the guide is not a "cookbook" and requires "discussion and decision making by the key stakeholders in the enterprise."

3. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). "COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: The way forward." In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4798-4807). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.147. This academic paper reinforces the stakeholder-centric nature of COBIT, which underpins the need for stakeholder involvement in key decisions.

Scroll to Top