PMI-ACP practice question 4 of 35

The agile team disagrees with the business stakeholders on completing some epics What could help eliminate misunderstandings?

Full set: 482 questions
Answer options
A: Agree on requirements with all stakeholders
B: Begin planning every four iterations
C: Consider previous sprint demo feedback when planning the next sprint Correct answer
D: Include the reasons for the project in the contract
Correct Answer:
C. Consider previous sprint demo feedback when planning the next sprint
Explanation

The core of the problem is a misunderstanding and misalignment between the team and business stakeholders. Agile methodologies address this through frequent feedback loops. The sprint review (or demo) is the primary formal event for the team to demonstrate the working product increment to stakeholders and get their feedback. By explicitly considering this feedback during the next sprint's planning, the team ensures that its understanding is aligned with stakeholder expectations. This iterative process of demonstrating, gathering feedback, and adapting the plan is fundamental to reducing misunderstandings and ensuring the project delivers value.

Why Incorrect

A. Attempting to get full agreement on all requirements upfront is a waterfall approach. Agile embraces the fact that requirements emerge and change over time.
B. Planning every four iterations is an arbitrary and infrequent cadence that would likely increase, not decrease, misunderstandings due to the long feedback cycle.
D. While a contract may state the project's purpose, it is a static document and not an effective tool for resolving ongoing, operational disagreements about specific epics.

References

1. Schwaber

K.

& Sutherland

J. (2020). The Scrum Guide. Scrum.org. The "Sprint Review" section states its purpose is to "inspect the outcome of the Sprint and determine future adaptations

" which directly involves stakeholder feedback influencing future plans.

2. Project Management Institute. (2017). Agile Practice Guide. Section 5.2.8

Review/Demonstration

p. 66. "The team demonstrates the work that it has 'Done'... The product owner and the team get feedback that they can incorporate in the next iteration."

3. Stray

V.

Sjøberg

D. I.

& Dybå

T. (2016). The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study. Journal of Systems and Software

114

101-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.004. While focused on stand-ups

the paper reinforces the importance of frequent communication and feedback cycles in agile to maintain alignment.

Scroll to Top